Training Database
The Training Database defines how MOOD MNKY agents are trained, evaluated, and improved over time. It provides a structured approach for maintaining training data, evaluation processes, and performance metrics to ensure agents deliver high-quality, consistent experiences.Purpose and Role
The Training Database defines “how” agents learn and improve, ensuring continuous refinement of their capabilities and performance.
- Training datasets and their characteristics
- Evaluation methodologies and benchmarks
- Performance metrics and improvement targets
- Feedback collection and incorporation
- Model version control and release management
- Quality assurance processes and standards
Schema and Structure
- Database Schema
- Example Entry
Field Descriptions
training_id
training_id
A unique identifier for the training record.
agent_id
agent_id
The ID of the agent being trained.
dataset_id
dataset_id
The ID of the dataset used for training.
model_version
model_version
The base model version or identifier.
training_type
training_type
The type of training performed (fine-tuning, prompt engineering, etc.).
parameters
parameters
Training parameters and configuration.
metrics
metrics
Performance metrics and evaluation results.
status
status
Current status of the training (pending, in_progress, completed, failed).
created_at
created_at
When the training was initiated.
completed_at
completed_at
When the training was completed.
created_by
created_by
The user or system that initiated the training.
artifacts
artifacts
Paths to model files, logs, and other training artifacts.
notes
notes
Additional information and observations about the training.
Training Methodologies
The MOOD MNKY agent system employs various approaches to training and improving agents:Prompt Engineering
Systematic refinement of instructions, examples, and constraints to optimize agent behavior without modifying the underlying model.
- System message optimization
- Few-shot example curation
- Response format structuring
- Constraint definition
- Chain-of-thought guidance
Fine-tuning
Adjustment of model weights using carefully curated datasets to improve performance on specific tasks and align with brand voice.
- Response quality improvements
- Domain-specific knowledge
- Brand tone and voice alignment
- Specialized capability enhancement
- Error reduction for common cases
Retrieval Augmentation
Enhancement of agent capabilities by integrating external knowledge sources and dynamically retrieved context.
- Knowledge base integration
- Vector store implementation
- Chunking and indexing strategies
- Query formulation optimization
- Context window management
Behavioral Alignment
Techniques to ensure agent outputs align with desired behaviors, safety standards, and ethical guidelines.
- Constitutional AI approaches
- Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
- Safety boundary implementation
- Bias detection and mitigation
- Response quality control
Training Datasets
The system maintains several types of datasets for agent training and evaluation:- Conversation Datasets
- Task-specific Datasets
- Evaluation Benchmarks
Evaluation Framework
Core Metrics
Functional Accuracy
- Task completion rate
- Information accuracy
- Procedural correctness
- Error rate
- Recovery capability
User Experience
- Response relevance
- Helpfulness rating
- User satisfaction
- Conversation flow
- Clarity and conciseness
Brand Alignment
- Tone consistency
- Brand value reflection
- Voice appropriateness
- Messaging alignment
- Visual harmony
Safety
- Policy compliance
- Boundary adherence
- Refusal quality
- Risk mitigation
- Content appropriateness
Efficiency
- Response time
- Resolution speed
- Turn efficiency
- Resource utilization
- Cost-effectiveness
Adaptability
- Context handling
- Ambiguity resolution
- Error recovery
- Flexibility
- Learning application
Evaluation Processes
Integration with OpenAI Agents SDK
Agent Version Management
A/B Testing Implementation
Training Infrastructure
The MOOD MNKY training system uses specialized infrastructure for different training approaches:- Prompt Engineering
- Fine-tuning
- Evaluation
Continuous Improvement Process
The MOOD MNKY agent system follows a structured improvement cycle:1
Data Collection
Gathering user interactions, feedback, and performance metrics from production environments to identify improvement opportunities
2
Analysis & Prioritization
Analyzing collected data to identify patterns, issues, and high-impact improvement areas, then prioritizing them based on business impact
3
Hypothesis Development
Formulating specific improvement hypotheses with expected outcomes and measurement approaches
4
Implementation
Implementing improvements through prompt engineering, fine-tuning, or system modifications
5
Evaluation
Testing improvements against benchmarks and through A/B testing to validate hypotheses
6
Deployment
Rolling out validated improvements to production with appropriate monitoring
7
Monitoring
Continuously tracking performance to ensure improvements maintain effectiveness over time
Feedback Collection
The system collects various forms of feedback to guide training and improvement:Explicit User Feedback
Direct feedback from users about their experience:
- Ratings and reviews
- Feature requests
- Error reports
- Satisfaction surveys
- Support tickets
Implicit Behavioral Signals
Observed patterns in user behavior:
- Conversation completion rates
- Follow-up question frequency
- Task success indicators
- Engagement metrics
- Repeat usage patterns
Human Evaluation
Expert assessment of agent performance:
- Accuracy verification
- Response quality scoring
- Brand alignment review
- Safety evaluation
- Improvement suggestions
System Metrics
Technical performance indicators:
- Response latency
- Error rates
- Token usage efficiency
- Completion rates
- API performance
Best Practices for Agent Training
Data Quality
- Representative Sampling: Ensure training data covers the full range of expected use cases
- Balanced Coverage: Maintain appropriate distribution across different tasks and scenarios
- Quality Control: Implement rigorous review processes for training data
- Continuous Enrichment: Regularly update datasets with new examples and edge cases
- Diversity Consideration: Include diverse perspectives and language patterns
Evaluation Design
- Comprehensive Benchmarks: Create benchmarks that cover all critical capabilities
- Real-world Alignment: Design evaluation scenarios that reflect actual usage
- Objective Metrics: Define clear, measurable criteria for success
- Human-in-the-loop: Combine automated evaluation with human assessment
- Progressive Standards: Gradually increase quality thresholds as capabilities improve
Deployment Strategy
- Staged Rollout: Use progressive deployment to limit risk
- Rollback Readiness: Maintain capability to quickly revert to previous versions
- Monitoring Plan: Define key metrics to watch during and after deployment
- Feedback Mechanisms: Implement channels for collecting user feedback on changes
- Documentation: Maintain clear records of changes and their expected effects
Continuous Improvement
- Regular Review Cycles: Establish scheduled reviews of agent performance
- Targeted Improvements: Focus on specific capabilities rather than general changes
- Impact Measurement: Quantify the effect of each improvement
- Learning Documentation: Maintain knowledge base of what works and what doesn’t
- Cross-functional Input: Incorporate perspectives from multiple stakeholders